The way it was coded, it clobbered %rdx without telling the compiler.
This generally didn't cause any problems except when there are two back
to back invocations (as in plt_overflow()), as in that case the
compiler may validly assume that it can re-use for the second instance
the value loaded into %rdx before the first one.
Once at it, also properly relax the second operand of "mul" (there's no
need for it to be in %rdx, or a register at all), and switch away from
using explicit register names in the instruction operands.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
delta <<= scale->shift;
asm (
- "mul %%rdx ; shrd $32,%%rdx,%%rax"
- : "=a" (product) : "0" (delta), "d" ((u64)scale->mul_frac) );
+ "mul %2 ; shrd $32,%1,%0"
+ : "=a" (product), "=d" (delta)
+ : "rm" (delta), "0" ((u64)scale->mul_frac) );
return product;
}